A dual telescoping lag screw nailing system for intertrochanteric fractures: retrospective analysis of clinical and radiologic outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this system is associated with a reduced rate of failure and complications in patients treated for proximal femoral fractures with intramedullary nailing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 742 Patients with AO-OTA 31-A intertrochanteric fractures were enrolled at a single Institution. Functional evaluation was assessed through the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) instrument and Parker's New Mobility Score (NMS). Radiological follow-up included the degree of the reduction according to the Baumgartner criteria, the Tip-Apex Distance, and the shortening of the telescoping screws and its lateral protrusion. RESULTS: Pre-operative mean FIM™ and NMS were 4.3 (range 1-9) and 98.7 (range 22-126), respectively. At the 12-month follow-up the average FIM™ and NMS were 95.3 (range 22-126) and 3.7 (range 1-9), respectively. Mean shortening of the lag screws was 4.3 mm (range 1-8) and mean lateral protrusion was 1.7 mm (range 0-3). 3 Cases (0.70%) of non-consolidation requiring reoperation were recorded. 1 Case (0.24%) of these cases was also characterized by nail breakage. No case of cut-out has been reported at our follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This dual telescoping nail system is effective and safe. The sliding of the telescoping screws within the barrel is able to decrease strain from the femoral head during weight bearing reducing the risk of cut-out.

Anatomic Reduction of Greater Tuberosity Fragment for Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty: a Predictor of Good Clinical Outcome.

Objectives: Proximal humerus fractures account for four-five % of all fractures. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is indicated for complex fractures with high complication rates when treated with ORIF. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between the proper intraoperative tuberosity reduction, and the mid-to-long-term clinical outcome in a series of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture. Methods: Forty-one patients with proximal humerus fractures who underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery between July 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Quantitative analysis of the reduction of the tuberosities was performed on postoperative X-rays focusing on the distance between reconstructed greater tuberosity and the apex of the head of the prosthesis, (head-tuberosity distance), and contact between tuberosity and humerus diaphysis. The University of California Los Angeles Score (UCLA) was calculated for each patient. Results: The mean time to surgery was 6.29 ± 2.8 days (range 2-18 days). Nine patients out of 41 (22%) had non anatomic tuberosity, and 32 (78%) were anatomic reduced. The UCLA score at the final follow-up was good and excellent (≥27) in 27 patients (66%), and poor (<27) in 14 (34%). A significant correlation was observed between proper tuberosity reduction and good/excellent UCLA scores (P<0.001). Conclusion: Hemiarthroplasty is a valid and reliable technique for the treatment of proximal humerus fracture not eligible for internal fixation, with high risk of failure. The proper tuberosity reconstruction, paying special attention to the HTD and the contact between the cortical of the humeral diaphysis and the reconstructed tuberosity, is essential to reach a good clinical outcome.

Accuracy of radiographic projections to guide cephalic screw position in pertrochanteric fracture: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Löwenstein Lateral view and the True Lateral view for the positioning of the cephalic hip screw, through a cadaveric study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We placed two Kirschner wires in eight femur specimens using an Antero-Posterior view, Löwenstein Lateral view and True Lateral view. The distances between the Kirschner wires and the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior cortex were measured in all projections. The head of the femur was then sectioned, and the same macroscopic distances were measured. Finally, we could calculate the accuracy of the two radiographic lateral projections. RESULTS: When the Kirschner wire was placed in the center of the head using the Antero-Posterior and the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9705 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1479 and 1.1584, respectively. When the Kirschner wire was placed superior on the Antero-Posterior and centrally on the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9930 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1159 and 0.7224, respectively. CONCLUSION: When the Kirschner wire was positioned proximal in Antero-Posterior view and central in True Lateral view, only the True Lateral view showed high accuracy.

Acetabular Morphology Predicts the Risk of Dislocation Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly.

BACKGROUND: Hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation is a devastating complication. Among other preoperative risk factors, acetabular morphology has been rarely studied. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative native acetabular morphology on hemiarthroplasty dislocation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 867 patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2019. The 380 included patients were treated with an anterior-based muscle-sparing approach. The central-edge angle (CEA) and acetabular depth-to-width ratio (ADWR) of the fractured hip were measured preoperatively on the anteroposterior pelvic view. Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to analyze the optimal cutoff for CEA and ADWR. Hemiarthroplasty dislocation occurred in 18 patients (4.7%), and the remaining 362 patients were used as the control group. RESULTS: No significant differences in terms of sex, age, dementia, neuromuscular disease, and body mass index were found between the 2 groups. The 18 patients who had a hip dislocation had significantly smaller mean CEA than the control group (P = .0001) (mean 36.1 ± 7.5° and 43.2 ± 5.6°, respectively) as well as ADWR (mean 34 ± 6 versus 37 ± 4, respectively) (P = .001). Using the receiver operating characteristic analysis, we report significant cutoffs of 38.5° for CEA (P = .0001) and 34.5 for the ADWR (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Higher rates of hemiarthroplasty dislocation were observed in patients who had a preoperative CEA of less than 38.5° and an ADWR of less than 34.5. Patients who have preoperative acetabular morphological risk factors for dislocation might be better candidates for a total hip arthroplasty.

The use of posteromedial portal for arthroscopic treatment of synovial chondromatosis of the knee: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The synovial chondromatosis is an uncommon proliferative metaplastic process of the synovial cells that can develop in any synovial joint. An isolated primary chondromatosis of the posterior compartment of the knee is uncommon and few cases are reported in literature. Our purpose is to describe a rare case of primary chondromatosis of the knee posterior compartment and report the arthroscopic loose bodies excision through a difficult posteromedial portal, avoiding the use of the accessory posterior portal, most commonly reported for approaching this disease. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a rare case of a 35-year-old Caucasian male patient with diagnosis of chondromatosis of the posterior knee compartment. The radiographs showed multiple loose bodies of the posterior compartment. The MRI revealed minimal synovial hypertrophy areas, multiple osteophytes in the intercondylar notch, and loose bodies in the posteromedial compartment. The CT allowed us to assess the bony structures, the morphology of the intercondylar notch, and the presence osteophytes of the medial and lateral femoral condyles. The CT images were crucial to plan how to reach the posterior compartments of the knee through a trans-notch passage. The patient underwent arthroscopic surgery using anteromedial, anterolateral, and posteromedial portals. The tunneling through the intercondylar osteophytes was performed to allow the arthroscope to pass trans-notch. To avoid additional accessory posterior portals, we used a 70° arthroscope to better explore the posterior knee compartment. The cartilage-like bodies were removed and synovectomy of the inflamed areas was performed. The clinical and radiological follow-up was 12 months and the patient showed excellent clinical outcomes, returning to his activities of daily living and sport activity. CONCLUSION: Our case report highlights the importance of the arthroscopic approach to treat synovial chondromatosis, despite the involvement of the posterior compartment of the knee. An optimal preoperative imaging allows to plan for the proper surgical procedure even in patients with severe osteoarthritis. Moreover, the adoption of an intercondylar notch tunneling and a 70° arthroscope can help surgeons to better explore the posterior knee compartment, avoiding an accessory posterior trans-septal portal. Therefore, a synovectomy of the inflamed foci may be useful to prevent recurrence.